Hudson's patents claim:
There are no claims in the patent that this method of preparing monoatomic forms of elements have any health benefits!
It is worth noting that the patent office in granting a patent does NOT PROVE
that the patent does what it claims. The patent reviewer simply verifies that the
claims are reasonable and that they do not infringe on claims of other patents.
If the claims of the patent are not supported by the methods of the patent in the
hands of other individuals who later test them, the patent can be disallowed!
Posession of a patent does not provide strong evidence for scientific validity.
There is a transcript for a lecture by David Hudson on July 28, 1995 at:
http://www.onlinehealth.com/hudson.html,
http://www.xmall.com/hudson2.html
and a local copy.
A video of the lecture may be available at http://www.primenet.com/~cosmic/hudson.html.
It should be noted that the definition of the word "alchemy" is the infant stage of chemistry, aimed chiefly towards transmuting of other metals into gold, and discovering the elixir of life [The Chambers Dictionary].
David Hudson's Patent does NOT contain the words alchemy or transmute.
There is no evidence (that Aeiveos can find) that monoatomic gold (Au) or other elements such as silver (Ag), platinium (Pt), rhodium (Rh) or Silicon (Si) have any health benefits. Claims that such benefits exist require verification in legitimate scientific journals before they should be accepted.
Note that some other metals, particularly Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Selenium (Se), Molybdenum (Mo), Manganese (Mn), and Nickel (Ni) are essential cofactors in vitamins or enzymes which are critical for normal health. These elements are required in small amounts and large doses can be toxic. Further documentation can be found in Metal Use in Animals and Humans
Any claims that elements such as gold or silicon provide health benefits would have to be proven since those benefits may in fact be due trace mineral contaminants in those products.
If studies have not been conducted in which the study group diet contains the trace metals for which benefits are claimed, while the control group diet lacks those trace metals (either in normal or monoatomic forms), then any claims for health beneifts are specious.
"Etherium gold contains certain monatomic elements which cause it to
act as an electromagnetic superconductor on a cellular, in fact DNA,
level. It has been shown to completely repair damaged DNA. It has
also been proven to cause the human body's vibrational level to
rise, the spiritual implications of this are endless. It can
stimulate all kinds of enhanced awareness and growth, as well as
dramatically increased health and well being."
To date, Ian has been unwilling to provide any scientific data to
support his claims. He instead responds with:
"Look in response to this, and the rest of your post, I would like to
make it very clear that ALL OF THIS has been researched and proven.
You are attempting to insult me simply because you are uninformed. I
have already gotten a few responses like yours and I am sick of it."
It is easy to claim something has been researched and proven.
It is much more difficult to point to legitimate sources which do that.
We at Aeiveos Sciences Group are more than willing to present such
information if individuals are willing to back up their claims.